All gists

Last active 4 days ago
0 0 1
1 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
2 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
3 "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
4 <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
5 <head>
6 <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
7 <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
8 <title>AI for Programming</title>
9 <meta name="generator" content="Org Mode" />
10 <style type="text/css">
Last active 4 days ago
0 0 1
1 * Conversation with Fable5.1
2
3 ** 有观点认为:绝大多数程序员其实根本没学会流畅地编程,因此相比之下 AI coding 才是巨大的提升,因为 AI 真的把这门外语学到了 fluency。使用辩证法分析:先论述正题、反题,最后综合为非平凡的合题。
4
5 *** Thinking
6
7 This is asking me to build a dialectical argument in Chinese - I need to lay out the thesis that most programmers never truly mastered coding fluency while AI has, then construct a counterargument, before working toward a deeper synthesis.
8
9 For the antithesis, I'm questioning the whole framing: fluency was never really the bottleneck for programmers, and code isn't a "foreign language" in the way this analogy suggests—AI's fluency is really just surface-level pattern mastery, while the real skill lies in decomposing problems and exercising judgment about the domain.